Re: [PATCH][arm] Make gcc.target/arm/copysign_softfloat_1.c more robust

On 23 January 2018 at 15:57, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi Christophe, > > On 23/01/18 13:09, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> >> Hi Kyrill, >> >> On 22 January 2018 at 11:48, Kyrill Tkachov >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This test has needlessly restrictive requirements. It tries to force a >>> soft-

Re: [PATCH][arm] Make gcc.target/arm/copysign_softfloat_1.c more robust

Hi Christophe, On 23/01/18 13:09, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi Kyrill, On 22 January 2018 at 11:48, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, This test has needlessly restrictive requirements. It tries to force a soft-float target and tries to run. This makes it unsupportable for any non-soft-float varian

Re: [PATCH][arm] Make gcc.target/arm/copysign_softfloat_1.c more robust

Hi Kyrill, On 22 January 2018 at 11:48, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi all, > > This test has needlessly restrictive requirements. It tries to force a > soft-float target and tries to run. > This makes it unsupportable for any non-soft-float variant. > In fact, the test can be a run-time test for an

[PATCH][arm] Make gcc.target/arm/copysign_softfloat_1.c more robust

Hi all, This test has needlessly restrictive requirements. It tries to force a soft-float target and tries to run. This makes it unsupportable for any non-soft-float variant. In fact, the test can be a run-time test for any target, and only the scan-assembler tests are specific to -mfloat-abi=s