On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 18:15, François Dumont wrote:
>
> On 23/01/23 10:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 06:02, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> > wrote:
> >> libstdc++: [_GLIBCXX_DEBUG] Remove useless constructor checks
> >>
> >> Creating a safe iterator from a no
On 23/01/23 10:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 06:02, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
libstdc++: [_GLIBCXX_DEBUG] Remove useless constructor checks
Creating a safe iterator from a normal iterator is done within the
library where we
already know that it
On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 06:02, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> libstdc++: [_GLIBCXX_DEBUG] Remove useless constructor checks
>
> Creating a safe iterator from a normal iterator is done within the
> library where we
> already know that it is done correctly. The rare situation
libstdc++: [_GLIBCXX_DEBUG] Remove useless constructor checks
Creating a safe iterator from a normal iterator is done within the
library where we
already know that it is done correctly. The rare situation where a
user would use safe
iterators for his own purpose is non-Standard