t; >> To: Tamar Christina
>> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
>> >> ; Marcus Shawcroft
>> >> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
>>
>> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]AArch64 SVE: Fix multiple comparison masks
>> >> on inverted
;> -Original Message-
> >> >> From: Richard Sandiford
> >> >> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:50 PM
> >> >> To: Tamar Christina
> >> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
> >> >> ; Marcus Shawcroft
> &g
2021 3:50 PM
>> >> To: Tamar Christina
>> >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
>> >> ; Marcus Shawcroft
>> >> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
>>
>> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]AArch64 SVE: Fix multiple comparison masks
>> >
nd ; Richard Earnshaw
> >> ; Marcus Shawcroft
> >> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]AArch64 SVE: Fix multiple comparison masks
> >> on inverted operands
> >>
> >> Tamar Christina writes:
> >> > Hi All,
> &
chov
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]AArch64 SVE: Fix multiple comparison masks on
>> inverted operands
>>
>> Tamar Christina writes:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > This RFC is trying to address the following inefficiency when
>> > vectorizing co
Hi Richard,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 3:50 PM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd ; Richard Earnshaw
> ; Marcus Shawcroft
> ; Kyrylo Tkachov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]AArch64 SVE: Fix mult
Tamar Christina writes:
> Hi All,
>
> This RFC is trying to address the following inefficiency when vectorizing
> conditional statements with SVE.
>
> Consider the case
>
> void f10(double * restrict z, double * restrict w, double * restrict x,
>double * restrict y, int n)
> {
> for (i
Hi All,
This RFC is trying to address the following inefficiency when vectorizing
conditional statements with SVE.
Consider the case
void f10(double * restrict z, double * restrict w, double * restrict x,
double * restrict y, int n)
{
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
z[i] = (w[
