On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
> > (also, in C op2 and op3 of a ternary operator always have integer promotions
> > applied, but for vector selection we should use unpromoted types)
>
> Yes. So a good testcase would use char typed variable then. It’s
> unfortunate C and C++ do no
> Am 18.07.2024 um 17:37 schrieb Alexander Monakov :
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>>> If both b and c are scalars and the type of true?b:c has the same size
>>> as the element type of a, then b and c are converted to a vector type
>>> whose elements have this type
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
> >If both b and c are scalars and the type of true?b:c has the same size
> >as the element type of a, then b and c are converted to a vector type
> >whose elements have this type and with the same number of elements as a.
> >
> > (in https:
> Am 18.07.2024 um 16:22 schrieb Alexander Monakov :
>
>
>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> The following adds support for vector conditionals in C. The support
>> was nearly there already but c_objc_common_truthvalue_conversion
>> rejecting vector types. Instead of lettin
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
> The following adds support for vector conditionals in C. The support
> was nearly there already but c_objc_common_truthvalue_conversion
> rejecting vector types. Instead of letting them pass there unchanged
> I chose to instead skip it when parsing
The following adds support for vector conditionals in C. The support
was nearly there already but c_objc_common_truthvalue_conversion
rejecting vector types. Instead of letting them pass there unchanged
I chose to instead skip it when parsing conditionals instead as a
variant with less possible f
