On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:25 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/24/19 4:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > You still get one instance in each TU ...
>
> Right, fixed in attached patch.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
Yes.
Thanks,
On 6/25/19 12:25 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/24/19 4:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> You still get one instance in each TU ...
>
> Right, fixed in attached patch.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
Btw.
On 6/24/19 4:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> You still get one instance in each TU ...
Right, fixed in attached patch.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
>From aa5ea14a8665b14aa60245c42bd4c9809d0bf81a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:51 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/24/19 2:29 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:08 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:04 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2
On 6/24/19 2:29 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:08 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:04 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, J
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 1:08 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:04 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >
> > On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > >>> On 5/22/19 3:13 AM,
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:04 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>> On 5/22/19 3:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
On 6/12/19 2:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> New params should always go to the end
Ah, sorry, I'll take of that new time.
I've just changed the function signature and I can verify there are no
other calls (tested for --enable-languages=all).
Thanks,
Martin
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:45 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/12/19 11:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:15 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/12/19 10:02 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>> On 6/12/19 9:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:02 PM Jas
On 6/12/19 11:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:15 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 6/12/19 10:02 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 6/12/19 9:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:02 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 6/11/19 9:16 AM, Martin Liška wro
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:15 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/12/19 10:02 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 6/12/19 9:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:02 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 6/11/19 9:16 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/11/19 2:27 PM, Jason Merrill wr
On 6/12/19 10:02 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/12/19 9:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:02 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/11/19 9:16 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/11/19 2:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/11/19 3:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 6/10/19
On 6/12/19 9:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:02 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> On 6/11/19 9:16 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 6/11/19 2:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/11/19 3:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/10/19 8:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 9:02 PM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 6/11/19 9:16 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 6/11/19 2:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On 6/11/19 3:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>> On 6/10/19 8:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:08 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
On 6/11/19 9:16 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/11/19 2:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/11/19 3:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/10/19 8:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:08 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/7/19 11:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:14 AM Marti
On 6/11/19 2:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 6/11/19 3:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 6/10/19 8:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:08 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/7/19 11:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:14 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 6
On 6/11/19 3:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/10/19 8:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:08 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/7/19 11:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:14 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/7/19 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2
On 6/10/19 8:21 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:08 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 6/7/19 11:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:14 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/7/19 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:03 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:08 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/7/19 11:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:14 AM Martin Liška wrote:
> >> On 6/7/19 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:03 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener w
On 6/7/19 11:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:14 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 6/7/19 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:03 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 8:14 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/7/19 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:03 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Je
On 6/7/19 5:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Ok for trunk? Which one?
Thank you Jakub for the fix. I'm fine with both.
Martin
Hi!
Attached are two different fixes, each of which fixes the build.
The first one arranges gencondmd to be linked against build/errors.o,
so that it links fine, the second one instead doesn't define the function
and method which requires that, as it is only called from #if CHECKING_P
guarded code
On 6/7/19 6:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/7/19 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:03 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/22/19 3:13 AM, Martin L
On 6/7/19 2:09 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:03 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 5/22/19 3:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> O
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 2:03 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>> On 5/22/19 3:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
On 6/7/19 10:57 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 5/22/19 3:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:35 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 5/22/19 3:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 5/21/19 11:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On 6/1/19 12:06 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 5/22/19 3:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/21/19 11:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:07 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>>
On 5/22/19 3:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/21/19 11:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:07 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 5/13/19 1:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
On 5/31/19 2:50 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:13 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/21/19 11:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:07 AM Jeff
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 11:13 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Martin Liška wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/21/19 11:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:07 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 5/13/19 1:41 AM,
On 5/21/19 1:51 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>> On 5/21/19 11:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:07 AM Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/13/19 1:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/8/18 9:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 5/21/19 11:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:07 AM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/13/19 1:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>> On 11/8/18 9:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/7/18 11:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>>
On 5/21/19 11:38 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:07 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 5/13/19 1:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 11/8/18 9:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/7/18 11:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/30/18 6:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 10/30/18 11:03
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:07 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 5/13/19 1:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 11/8/18 9:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> On 11/7/18 11:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>> On 10/30/18 6:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29
On 5/13/19 1:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/8/18 9:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 11/7/18 11:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 10/30/18 6:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:14:21PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>> +hashtab_
On 5/13/19 3:41 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/8/18 9:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 11/7/18 11:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/30/18 6:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:14:21PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
+hashtab_chk_error ()
+{
+ f
On 11/8/18 9:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/7/18 11:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 10/30/18 6:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:14:21PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> +hashtab_chk_error ()
> +{
> + fprintf (stderr,
On 11/7/18 11:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/30/18 6:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:14:21PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
+hashtab_chk_error ()
+{
+ fprintf (stderr, "hash table checking failed: "
+ "equa
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 03:23:55PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > @@ -882,8 +883,12 @@ hash_table
> >if (insert == INSERT && m_size * 3 <= m_n_elements * 4)
> > expand ();
> >
> > - m_searches++;
> > +#if ENABLE_EXTRA_CHECKING
> > +if (insert == INSERT)
> > + verify (comparable, ha
On 10/30/18 6:28 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:14:21PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> +hashtab_chk_error ()
>>> +{
>>> + fprintf (stderr, "hash table checking failed: "
>>> + "equal operator returns true for a pair "
>>> +
On 10/30/18 11:03 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:14:21PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>> +hashtab_chk_error ()
>> +{
>> + fprintf (stderr, "hash table checking failed: "
>> + "equal operator returns true for a pair "
>> + "of values with a different hash value");
>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:14:21PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> +hashtab_chk_error ()
> +{
> + fprintf (stderr, "hash table checking failed: "
> +"equal operator returns true for a pair "
> +"of values with a different hash value");
BTW, either use internal_error here, or at least
On 10/29/18 2:53 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
>> My question is whether we want to have in GCC 9 time frame or should I wait
>> with that?
>> Does it worth implementing?
>
> This is cool, thanks! A few questions/comments on the patch.
Hi.
Thanks for su
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Martin Liška wrote:
> My question is whether we want to have in GCC 9 time frame or should I wait
> with that?
> Does it worth implementing?
This is cool, thanks! A few questions/comments on the patch.
I think there are places that use libiberty C-style hashtab (htab_t), wou
Hi.
As slightly discussed here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg01674.html I fixed
a situation where an equal operator of a hash table returns true, while
corresponding hash
value of a pair of elements is different. That's inconsistent and can probably
cause issues
in different ar
47 matches
Mail list logo