On 10/16/12, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 2012-10-16 10:43 , Richard Biener wrote:
> > Diego - is PTH still live? Thus, do I need to bother about
> > inventing things in a way that can be hook-ized?
>
> We will eventually revive PPH. But not in the short term. I think
> it will come back when/if w
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 2012-10-16 10:43 , Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > This patch shows work-in-progress (read: implementation uglyness
> > hopefully to vanish ...) regarding to moving LTO type merging
> > work from WPA to compile stage.
>
> You mean to LTRANS, the stage
On 2012-10-16 10:43 , Richard Biener wrote:
This patch shows work-in-progress (read: implementation uglyness
hopefully to vanish ...) regarding to moving LTO type merging
work from WPA to compile stage.
You mean to LTRANS, the stage after WPA, right?
The patch re-organizes lto_output_tree (t
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This patch shows work-in-progress (read: implementation uglyness
> hopefully to vanish ...) regarding to moving LTO type merging
> work from WPA to compile stage.
>
> The patch re-organizes lto_output_tree (the write_tree streamer
> hook for LTO) in
This patch shows work-in-progress (read: implementation uglyness
hopefully to vanish ...) regarding to moving LTO type merging
work from WPA to compile stage.
The patch re-organizes lto_output_tree (the write_tree streamer
hook for LTO) in a way so that we output all tree fields
in easy to discov
