Re: [PATCH][RFC] Less TODO_remove_unused_locals

2013-02-21 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > > Hunting for the "we're getting slower" bits I noticed that > > > TODO_remove_unused_locals is a big part of execute_function_todo > > > (and accounts for 1% of compile-time of ac.f90). > > > The following patch removes most of the remove_unused_loca

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Less TODO_remove_unused_locals

2013-02-21 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hunting for the "we're getting slower" bits I noticed that TODO_remove_unused_locals is a big part of execute_function_todo (and accounts for 1% of compile-time of ac.f90). The following patch removes most of the remove_unused_locals calls based on the fact that with anonymous SSA names now avai

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Less TODO_remove_unused_locals

2013-02-20 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Richard Biener wrote: > > Hunting for the "we're getting slower" bits I noticed that > TODO_remove_unused_locals is a big part of execute_function_todo > (and accounts for 1% of compile-time of ac.f90). > The following patch removes most of the remove_unused_locals > calls ba

[PATCH][RFC] Less TODO_remove_unused_locals

2013-02-20 Thread Richard Biener
Hunting for the "we're getting slower" bits I noticed that TODO_remove_unused_locals is a big part of execute_function_todo (and accounts for 1% of compile-time of ac.f90). The following patch removes most of the remove_unused_locals calls based on the fact that with anonymous SSA names now availa