On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/17/2017 02:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On January 16, 2017 7:27:53 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law
>>> wrote:
On 01/16/2017 01:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>>
On 01/17/2017 02:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On January 16, 2017 7:27:53 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/16/2017 01:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
At one time I know I had the max_
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On January 16, 2017 7:27:53 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>>On 01/16/2017 01:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
At one time I know I had the max_size == size test in
>>valid_ao_ref
On January 16, 2017 7:27:53 PM GMT+01:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 01/16/2017 01:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> At one time I know I had the max_size == size test in
>valid_ao_ref_for_dse.
>>> But it got lost at some point. This is what cause
On 01/16/2017 01:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
At one time I know I had the max_size == size test in valid_ao_ref_for_dse.
But it got lost at some point. This is what caused the Ada failure.
Technically it'd be OK for the potentially dead stor
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> At one time I know I had the max_size == size test in valid_ao_ref_for_dse.
> But it got lost at some point. This is what caused the Ada failure.
>
> Technically it'd be OK for the potentially dead store to have a variable
> size as long as th
At one time I know I had the max_size == size test in
valid_ao_ref_for_dse. But it got lost at some point. This is what
caused the Ada failure.
Technically it'd be OK for the potentially dead store to have a variable
size as long as the later stores covered the entire range of the
potenti
