Hi!
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 17:04:03 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Is this change ok for OpenACC/PTX?
Well, it doesn't cause any visible regressions in libgomp testing for
OpenACC, so OK from that point of view.
The code that you're changing is not actually used for OpenACC; I first
though it was, unt
Hi, Thomas!
Is this change ok for OpenACC/PTX?
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 17:16:03 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Currently if a compiler is configured with enabled offloading, the 'devices'
> array in libgomp is filled properly with a number of available devices.
> However, if a program is compiled wi
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 17:16:03 +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently if a compiler is configured with enabled offloading, the 'devices'
> array in libgomp is filled properly with a number of available devices.
> However, if a program is compiled with -foffload=disable, the resolve_device
Hi!
Currently if a compiler is configured with enabled offloading, the 'devices'
array in libgomp is filled properly with a number of available devices.
However, if a program is compiled with -foffload=disable, the resolve_device
function returns a pointer to the device, and host-fallback is not h
