Re: [PATCH][Middle-end][version 2]2nd patch of PR78809 and PR83026

> > We're now in stage4 so please queue this patch and ping it during > next stage1. > I will update my patch based on Jeff and your comments, and send it during next stage 1. thanks. Qing

Re: [PATCH][Middle-end][version 2]2nd patch of PR78809 and PR83026

Hi, Jeff, Really sorry for my delay. Your email on 1/12/2018 and Richard’s email on 1/15/2018, were completely lost in my mailboxes until yesterday my colleague, Paolo Carlini, forwarded it to me. I really apologize for the late reply. Please see my reply below: > On Jan 12, 2018, at 4:

Re: [PATCH][Middle-end][version 2]2nd patch of PR78809 and PR83026

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/21/2017 02:25 PM, Qing Zhao wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I updated my patch based on all your comments. > > > > the major changes are the following: > > > > 1. replace the candidate calls with __builtin_str(n)cmp_eq instead of > > __builtin_memcmp_e

Re: [PATCH][Middle-end][version 2]2nd patch of PR78809 and PR83026

On 12/21/2017 02:25 PM, Qing Zhao wrote: > Hi, > > I updated my patch based on all your comments. > > the major changes are the following: > > 1. replace the candidate calls with __builtin_str(n)cmp_eq instead of > __builtin_memcmp_eq; > in builtins.c, when expanding the ne

Ping*2 [PATCH][Middle-end][version 2]2nd patch of PR78809 and PR83026

Hi, I’d like to ping the following patch the 2nd time: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01454.html I already addressed all the issues raised for the first version of the patch, and retested on both X86 and Aarch64, without any issue. I’d really like to make it into GCC 8. thank

Ping [PATCH][Middle-end][version 2]2nd patch of PR78809 and PR83026

Hi, I’d like to ping for the following patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg01454.html thanks a lot. For your reference, the first version of this patch is at: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00962.html

[PATCH][Middle-end][version 2]2nd patch of PR78809 and PR83026

Hi, I updated my patch based on all your comments. the major changes are the following: 1. replace the candidate calls with __builtin_str(n)cmp_eq instead of __builtin_memcmp_eq; in builtins.c, when expanding the new __builtin_str(n)cmp_eq call, expand them first as