On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:16, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > I'm going to apply it tomorrow, when full testing hopefully finished
>
> Sure. But remember the zombie kitties!
I have applied the fix for PR48437, the fix for PR49945 required
adjustment as
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:16, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I'm going to apply it tomorrow, when full testing hopefully finished
Sure. But remember the zombie kitties!
Diego.
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12/07/11 10:54, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/07/11 10:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 12/07/11 09:52, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
On 12/07/11 10:54, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12/07/11 10:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12/07/11 09:52, Richard Guenther wrote:
Index: gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
=
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12/07/11 10:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/07/11 09:52, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > >
> > > > Index: gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
> > > >
On 12/07/11 10:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12/07/11 09:52, Richard Guenther wrote:
Index: gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
===
*** gcc/lto-streamer-out.c (revision 182081)
--- gcc/lto-stream
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12/07/11 09:52, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > Index: gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
> > ===
> > *** gcc/lto-streamer-out.c (revision 182081)
> > --- gcc/lto-streamer-out.c (working copy)
> > **
On 12/07/11 09:52, Richard Guenther wrote:
Index: gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
===
*** gcc/lto-streamer-out.c (revision 182081)
--- gcc/lto-streamer-out.c (working copy)
*** tree_is_indexable (tree t)
*** 129,134 ***
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 03:52:35PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > *** gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr48437.c (revision 0)
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr48437.c (revision 0)
> > ***
> > *** 0
> > --- 1,15
> > + /* PR lt
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 03:52:35PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> *** gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr48437.c(revision 0)
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr48437.c(revision 0)
> ***
> *** 0
> --- 1,15
> + /* PR lto/48437 */
> + /* { dg-do run } */
> + /* { dg-optio
I'm testing the following patch for PR48437 - the C frontend generates
decl copies for placing them in BLOCK_VARS for
int
test (void)
{
extern int f (void);
return 0;
}
we currently end up putting those into the decl merging machinery,
causing DECL_CHAIN re-use and subsequent crashes. By no
11 matches
Mail list logo