On 29/07/20 11:33 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
+using type4 = std::unordered_set, std::equal_to,
+ not_noexcept_dflt_cons_alloc>>;
A couple of these tests use the wrong allocator type, which means they
fail when compiled as C++20.
Fixed with this
On 29/07/20 11:33 +0200, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
I eventually committed the attached patch which consider all your
remarks and moreover put back the move constructor implementation
where it used to be (not inline). It limits the size of the patch.
I also added comments on true_ty
I eventually committed the attached patch which consider all your
remarks and moreover put back the move constructor implementation where
it used to be (not inline). It limits the size of the patch.
I also added comments on true_type/false_type new usages like you
advised on [Hashtable 0/6] th
On 17/11/19 21:59 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
This patch adds noexcept qualification on allocator aware constructors
and fix the one on the default constructor.
   * include/bits/hashtable.h
   (_Hashtable(_Hashtable&& __ht, __node_alloc_type&& __a, true_type)):
   Add noexcept q
This patch adds noexcept qualification on allocator aware constructors
and fix the one on the default constructor.
* include/bits/hashtable.h
(_Hashtable(_Hashtable&& __ht, __node_alloc_type&& __a, true_type)):
Add noexcept qualification.
(_Hashtable(_Hashtable&&)): Fix noexcept
