Re: [PATCH][GCC10] arm: Fix unwanted fall-through in arm.c

Kyrylo Tkachov writes: >> -Original Message- >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Sent: 02 December 2020 16:06 >> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; Richard Earnshaw >> ; nd >> Subject: [PATCH][GCC10] arm: Fix unwanted fall-through in

RE: [PATCH][GCC10] arm: Fix unwanted fall-through in arm.c

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Corallo > Sent: 02 December 2020 16:06 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov ; Richard Earnshaw > ; nd > Subject: [PATCH][GCC10] arm: Fix unwanted fall-through in arm.c > > Hi all, > > this is to fix

Re: [PATCH][GCC10] arm: Fix unwanted fall-through in arm.c

Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches writes: > Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> this is to fix in GCC 10 the incomplete backport done by 1aabb312f of >> what at the time I fixed on master with dd019ef07. >> >> Regtested and bootstraped on arm-linux-gnueabihf. >> >> I guess sho

Re: [PATCH][GCC10] arm: Fix unwanted fall-through in arm.c

Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches writes: > Hi all, > > this is to fix in GCC 10 the incomplete backport done by 1aabb312f of > what at the time I fixed on master with dd019ef07. > > Regtested and bootstraped on arm-linux-gnueabihf. > > I guess should be under the obvious rule but prefer to ask, oka

[PATCH][GCC10] arm: Fix unwanted fall-through in arm.c

Hi all, this is to fix in GCC 10 the incomplete backport done by 1aabb312f of what at the time I fixed on master with dd019ef07. Regtested and bootstraped on arm-linux-gnueabihf. I guess should be under the obvious rule but prefer to ask, okay for gcc-10? Thanks Andrea >From a795f7aaf87fa36