On 22/12/2021 16:21, Murray Steele via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
On 22/12/2021 16:04, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Is there a PR in bugzilla for this?
R.
No, not at this time. It's something I came across whilst
making changes of my own.
For completeness, the ACLE specification I am referenc
Hi,
On 22/12/2021 16:04, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> Is there a PR in bugzilla for this?
>
> R.
>
No, not at this time. It's something I came across whilst
making changes of my own.
For completeness, the ACLE specification I am referencing
has been added below [1].
[1]: https://github.com/
On 22/12/2021 15:55, Murray Steele via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch fixes the implementation of the existing __arm_vld1q_z* and
> __arm_vst1q_p* MVE intrinsic functions.
>
> The MVE ACLE allows for __ARM_MVE_PRESERVE_USER_NAMESPACE to be defined,
> which removes definitions for int
Hi All,
This patch fixes the implementation of the existing __arm_vld1q_z* and
__arm_vst1q_p* MVE intrinsic functions.
The MVE ACLE allows for __ARM_MVE_PRESERVE_USER_NAMESPACE to be defined,
which removes definitions for intrinsic functions without the __arm_
prefix. __arm_vld1q_z* and __arm_vst
