Re: [PATCH][COMMITTED] Revert r238497 because of PR 71961.

2016-08-05 Thread Renlin Li
Hi Joost, I am not familiar with fortran code. Maybe Thomas can do something in his new patch? Regards, Renlin On 28/07/16 12:34, VandeVondele Joost wrote: Thanks.. I wonder if you could add the testcase in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961#c11 to the testsuite, as it catch

RE: [PATCH][COMMITTED] Revert r238497 because of PR 71961.

2016-07-28 Thread VandeVondele Joost
Thanks.. I wonder if you could add the testcase in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961#c11 to the testsuite, as it catches the underlying issue. Regards, Joost VandeVondele

[PATCH][COMMITTED] Revert r238497 because of PR 71961.

2016-07-28 Thread Renlin Li
Hi all, This patch reverts the change for PR 71902 since it causes 178.gagel miscompile in spec2000 as reported in PR 71961 which was observed in x86_64, aarch64, powerpc64. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961 As a consequence, I will reopen PR 71902: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi