Re: [PATCH][C-family] Fix PR61184

2014-07-09 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Fri, 16 May 2014, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 05/14/14 03:06, Richard Biener wrote: >> > >> > The following fixes pre/post-inc/dec gimplification of promoted >> > integer types. There is the issue with the way TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED >> > i

Re: [PATCH][C-family] Fix PR61184

2014-05-19 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/14/14 03:06, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > The following fixes pre/post-inc/dec gimplification of promoted > > integer types. There is the issue with the way TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED > > is related to TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS and the (non-)semantics of > >

Re: [PATCH][C-family] Fix PR61184

2014-05-16 Thread Jeff Law
On 05/14/14 03:06, Richard Biener wrote: The following fixes pre/post-inc/dec gimplification of promoted integer types. There is the issue with the way TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED is related to TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS and the (non-)semantics of -fno-strict-overflow. In this case, with -On -fno-strict-

[PATCH][C-family] Fix PR61184

2014-05-14 Thread Richard Biener
The following fixes pre/post-inc/dec gimplification of promoted integer types. There is the issue with the way TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED is related to TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS and the (non-)semantics of -fno-strict-overflow. In this case, with -On -fno-strict-overflow for a variable of type short we ha