On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > What I think is safe in grokdeclarator is using TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT here if
> > *either* the type given in the declaration specifiers is an array type
> > (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE, as in your previous patch) *or* the first
> > declarator tha
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > Indeed. I tried to let the array case alone (because it's so
> > complicated) but failed to do so. Appearantly
> >
> > if (declarator->kind == cdk_array && TYPE_QUALS (element_type))
> > type
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Indeed. I tried to let the array case alone (because it's so
> complicated) but failed to do so. Appearantly
>
> if (declarator->kind == cdk_array && TYPE_QUALS (element_type))
> type = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);
>
> leaves it alone (and does
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > 2011-03-02 Richard Guenther
> >
> > PR c/47939
> > * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Drop to the main variant only
> > for array types. Drop flag_gen_aux_info check.
>
> I can't convince m
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 2011-03-02 Richard Guenther
>
> PR c/47939
> * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Drop to the main variant only
> for array types. Drop flag_gen_aux_info check.
I can't convince myself that this is safe - that is, that it will maintain
