Re: [PATCH][ARM] RTABI half-precision conversion functions

2011-05-04 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 27 April 2011 17:26, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 21/04/11 16:58, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> >> You need to add >> >> %inherit GCC_4.7.0 GCC_4.6.0 >> GCC_4.7.0 { >> } > > Ok, done. Is this OK now? I can't approve the target independent parts of this but as I said on IRC based on a brief look I'm n

Re: [PATCH][ARM] RTABI half-precision conversion functions

2011-04-27 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 21/04/11 16:58, Joseph S. Myers wrote: You need to add %inherit GCC_4.7.0 GCC_4.6.0 GCC_4.7.0 { } Ok, done. Is this OK now? Andrew 2011-04-27 Andrew Stubbs gcc/ * config/arm/arm.c (arm_init_libfuncs): Change __gnu_f2h_ieee to __aeabi_f2h, __gnu_f2h_alternative to __aeabi_f2h_alt, __

Re: [PATCH][ARM] RTABI half-precision conversion functions

2011-04-21 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > On 14/02/11 18:20, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > Is there a reason you didn't add these functions to the shared libgcc > > (adjust t-bpabi and t-symbian accordingly, add them to libgcc-bpabi.ver at > > version GCC_4.6.0)? The GCC-specific names were delibe

Re: [PATCH][ARM] RTABI half-precision conversion functions

2011-04-14 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 14/02/11 18:20, Joseph S. Myers wrote: Is there a reason you didn't add these functions to the shared libgcc (adjust t-bpabi and t-symbian accordingly, add them to libgcc-bpabi.ver at version GCC_4.6.0)? The GCC-specific names were deliberately made static-only in the expectation that they wo