On 15/04/14 14:55, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 15/04/14 11:56, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This patch relates to PR60663 where cse got confused due to asm statements
being given a cost of zero in the arm backend. Jakub already put in a fix to
cse for 4.9.0 (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
On 15/04/14 11:56, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch relates to PR60663 where cse got confused due to asm statements
> being given a cost of zero in the arm backend. Jakub already put in a fix to
> cse for 4.9.0 (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00512.html) but
> we sho
Hi all,
This patch relates to PR60663 where cse got confused due to asm statements
being given a cost of zero in the arm backend. Jakub already put in a fix to
cse for 4.9.0 (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00512.html) but we
should still fix the costs in arm.
This patch does tha
