On 01/12/14 15:33, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 27 November 2014 at 11:35, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 26/08/14 13:36, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
test done
===
no regression on the full toolchain test on
On 27 November 2014 at 11:35, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
>> On 26/08/14 13:36, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
test done
===
no regression on the full toolchain test on arm-none-eabi.
>>
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
> On 26/08/14 13:36, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> test done
>>> ===
>>> no regression on the full toolchain test on arm-none-eabi.
>>>
>>>
>>> ok to install?
>>
>> Hmm, I think this is wrong for DF mod
On 26/08/14 13:36, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
test done
===
no regression on the full toolchain test on arm-none-eabi.
ok to install?
Hmm, I think this is wrong for DF mode. The principle the patch works
on is by tying the output to the value containing the
On 29/07/14 15:49, Jiong Wang wrote:
> this patch optimize copysign/copysignf for -mfloat-abi=soft on arm when BFI
> instruction is available.
>
> before this patch, we do copysign (a, b) by three steps:
>* fetch the sign bit of b to A
>* fetch all non-sign bits of a to B
>* or A and
this patch optimize copysign/copysignf for -mfloat-abi=soft on arm when BFI
instruction is available.
before this patch, we do copysign (a, b) by three steps:
* fetch the sign bit of b to A
* fetch all non-sign bits of a to B
* or A and B
while these three steps could be finished by one s
