On 24/03/14 17:21, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that we don't handle simple reg-to-reg arithmetic operations in the
> arm rtx cost functions. We should be adding the cost of alu.arith to the
> costs
> of the operands. This patch does that. Since we don't have any cost tables
>
On 02/04/14 13:55, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Pinging this for stage1, otherwise I'll forget about it and it'll fall through
the cracks...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01276.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01276.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/0
Pinging this for stage1, otherwise I'll forget about it and it'll fall through
the cracks...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01276.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 24/03/14 17:21, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that we don't handle simple reg-to-reg arithmetic operations in the
a
Hi all,
I noticed that we don't handle simple reg-to-reg arithmetic operations in the
arm rtx cost functions. We should be adding the cost of alu.arith to the costs
of the operands. This patch does that. Since we don't have any cost tables yet
that have a non-zero value for that field it shoul
