org; nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan;
Richard Earnshaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c
On 20/11/17 14:14, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
On 17 November 2017 at 12:12, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
On 17/11/17 10:45, Sudi Das wrote:
Hi Kyrill
Thanks I have made the change.
Th
Add -mfloat-abi=hard option.
From: Kyrill Tkachov
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2017 2:20 PM
To: Christophe Lyon
Cc: Sudi Das; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard
Earnshaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c
On 20/11/17 14:14, Christophe Lyon wro
; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard
Earnshaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c
On 20/11/17 14:14, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17 November 2017 at 12:12, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
>> On 17/11/17 10:45, Sudi Das wr
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 5:03 PM
To: Sudi Das; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c
Hi Sudi,
On 16/11/17 16:37, Sudi Das wrote:
Hi
This patch fixes the test case armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c for
arm-none-
;> Sudi
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Kyrill Tkachov
>> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 5:03 PM
>> To: Sudi Das; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Cc: nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c
>>
>&g
shnan; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c
Hi Sudi,
On 16/11/17 16:37, Sudi Das wrote:
Hi
This patch fixes the test case armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c for
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf where 2 of the scan-assembler directives were
failing. We now generate less vmov be
Hi Kyrill
Thanks I have made the change.
Sudi
From: Kyrill Tkachov
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 5:03 PM
To: Sudi Das; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: nd; Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix test armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c
Hi Sudi,
On 16/11/17 16:37, Sudi
Hi Sudi,
On 16/11/17 16:37, Sudi Das wrote:
Hi
This patch fixes the test case armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c for
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf where 2 of the scan-assembler directives were
failing. We now generate less vmov between core and VFP registers.
Thus changing those directives to reflect that.
Hi
This patch fixes the test case armv8_2-fp16-move-1.c for
arm-none-linux-gnueabihf where 2 of the scan-assembler directives were failing.
We now generate less vmov between core and VFP registers. Thus changing those
directives to reflect that.
Is this ok for trunk?
If yes could someone commi
