On 06/11/15 11:37, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03170.html
My apologies, I meant to ping another patch.
Please disregard that.
Kyrill
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 30/10/15 15:47, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 30/10/15 14:37, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 2
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03170.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 30/10/15 15:47, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 30/10/15 14:37, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 29/10/15 16:02, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
An arm-none-eabi build with RTL checking and --with-cpu=cortex-a9 fails beca
On 30/10/15 14:37, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 29/10/15 16:02, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
An arm-none-eabi build with RTL checking and --with-cpu=cortex-a9 fails because
cortex_a9_sched_adjust_cost tries to access the SET_DEST of a PARALLEL.
The correct thing to do is to call single_set
On 29/10/15 16:02, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> An arm-none-eabi build with RTL checking and --with-cpu=cortex-a9 fails
> because
> cortex_a9_sched_adjust_cost tries to access the SET_DEST of a PARALLEL.
> The correct thing to do is to call single_set on dep, which will return a
> simpl
Hi all,
An arm-none-eabi build with RTL checking and --with-cpu=cortex-a9 fails because
cortex_a9_sched_adjust_cost tries to access the SET_DEST of a PARALLEL.
The correct thing to do is to call single_set on dep, which will return a
simple SET
that we can take the SET_DEST of or NULL if there's
