Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand in movcond_addsi

2015-05-12 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 05/05/15 09:22, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, As the PR says, the movcond_addsi pattern takes the REGNO of an operand that may be a CONST_INT. The fix for that is rather simple (perhaps even obvious?). Unfortunately the testcase is in ada, and I'm not sure how to integrate this into the

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand in movcond_addsi

2015-05-12 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Ping. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00284.html Thanks, Kyrill On 05/05/15 11:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 05/05/15 09:22, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, As the PR says, the movcond_addsi pattern takes the REGNO of an operand that may be a CONST_INT. The fix for that is rather

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand in movcond_addsi

2015-05-05 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 05/05/15 09:22, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, As the PR says, the movcond_addsi pattern takes the REGNO of an operand that may be a CONST_INT. The fix for that is rather simple (perhaps even obvious?). Unfortunately the testcase is in ada, and I'm not sure how to integrate this into the t

[PATCH][ARM] Fix PR 65955: Do not take REGNO on non-REG operand in movcond_addsi

2015-05-05 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi all, As the PR says, the movcond_addsi pattern takes the REGNO of an operand that may be a CONST_INT. The fix for that is rather simple (perhaps even obvious?). Unfortunately the testcase is in ada, and I'm not sure how to integrate this into the testsuite. Does anyone know how to add an ad