On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This fixes an arm build failure due to removing the 'enum' keyword from
>> machine_mode.
>> Since libgcc2 is compiled with C rather than C++ we need it there for the
>> definitio
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This fixes an arm build failure due to removing the 'enum' keyword from
> machine_mode.
> Since libgcc2 is compiled with C rather than C++ we need it there for the
> definition of CUMULATIVE_ARGS.
But why is CUMULATIVE_ARGS needed for libg
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This fixes an arm build failure due to removing the 'enum' keyword from
> machine_mode.
> Since libgcc2 is compiled with C rather than C++ we need it there for the
> definition of CUMULATIVE_ARGS.
>
> Another place where machine_
On 29 October 2014 17:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This fixes an arm build failure due to removing the 'enum' keyword from
> machine_mode.
> Since libgcc2 is compiled with C rather than C++ we need it there for the
> definition of CUMULATIVE_ARGS.
>
> Another place where machine_mode is
Hi all,
This fixes an arm build failure due to removing the 'enum' keyword from
machine_mode.
Since libgcc2 is compiled with C rather than C++ we need it there for
the definition of CUMULATIVE_ARGS.
Another place where machine_mode is used is machine_function which is
not needed for libgcc2
