On Sep 13, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> gcc.target/arm/minmax_minus.c is really only valid when we have conditional
> execution available, that is non Thumb1-only targets. I've added an effective
> target check for that and used it in the test so that it does not get run and
> give
On 13/09/13 16:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
gcc.target/arm/minmax_minus.c is really only valid when we have
conditional execution available, that is non Thumb1-only targets. I've
added an effective target check for that and used it in the test so that
it does not get run and give a false ne
Hi all,
gcc.target/arm/minmax_minus.c is really only valid when we have
conditional execution available, that is non Thumb1-only targets. I've
added an effective target check for that and used it in the test so that
it does not get run and give a false negative when testing Thumb1 targets.
O
