Re: [PATCH][ARM][5 Backport] PR target/69875 Fix atomic_loaddi expansion

2016-03-19 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi all, > > This is the GCC 5 backport of > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.html. > The differences are that TARGET_HAVE_LPAE has to be defined in arm.h in a > different way because > the ARM_FSET_HAS_CPU1 mechanism does

Re: [PATCH][ARM][5 Backport] PR target/69875 Fix atomic_loaddi expansion

2016-03-07 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Ping. https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01626.html Thanks, Kyrill On 24/02/16 11:23, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, This is the GCC 5 backport of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.html. The differences are that TARGET_HAVE_LPAE has to be defined in arm.h in a diff

[PATCH][ARM][5 Backport] PR target/69875 Fix atomic_loaddi expansion

2016-02-24 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
Hi all, This is the GCC 5 backport of https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01338.html. The differences are that TARGET_HAVE_LPAE has to be defined in arm.h in a different way because the ARM_FSET_HAS_CPU1 mechanism doesn't exist on this branch. Also, the scan-assembler tests that check