On 03/02/16 10:07, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 03/02/16 09:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:46:31AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Nick,
On 03/02/16 08:35, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
I would like to approve this patch, but cannot, since it is not ARM
specific. I
On 03/02/16 09:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:46:31AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Nick,
On 03/02/16 08:35, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
I would like to approve this patch, but cannot, since it is not ARM
specific. I think that if you ping the list you may be
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:46:31AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On 03/02/16 08:35, Nick Clifton wrote:
> >Hi Kyrill,
> >
> > I would like to approve this patch, but cannot, since it is not ARM
> > specific. I think that if you ping the list you may be able to get a
> > respon
Hi Nick,
On 03/02/16 08:35, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
I would like to approve this patch, but cannot, since it is not ARM
specific. I think that if you ping the list you may be able to get a
response, and it would be nice to see this whole patch series checked
in before the gc
Hi Kyrill,
I would like to approve this patch, but cannot, since it is not ARM
specific. I think that if you ping the list you may be able to get a
response, and it would be nice to see this whole patch series checked
in before the gcc 6 branch occurs.
Cheers
Nick
PS. If necessary yo
Hi all,
This patch adds an execute testcase that is fixed by the arm.h hunk of Jim
Wilson's
patch that he posted at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg02132.html
I propose this testsuite change instead of the testsuite changes in that patch
since
the gcc.target/arm/wmul-[123].c reg
