On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:24:20AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It occurs to me that in the IOR-of-shifts form of the rev16 operation we
> should be costing the operand properly. For that we'd want to reuse the
> aarch_rev16_p function that does all the heavy lifting and get it to w
Ping.
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 12/05/15 10:07, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00013.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 01/05/15 09:24, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
It occurs to me that in the IOR-of-shifts form of the rev16 operation we should
be costing the operand
Ping.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00013.html
Thanks,
Kyrill
On 01/05/15 09:24, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
It occurs to me that in the IOR-of-shifts form of the rev16 operation we should
be costing the operand properly.
For that we'd want to reuse the aarch_rev16_p function
Hi all,
It occurs to me that in the IOR-of-shifts form of the rev16 operation we should
be costing the operand properly.
For that we'd want to reuse the aarch_rev16_p function that does all the heavy
lifting and get it to write the
innermost operand of the rev16 for further costing. In the proc
