On 15/09/15 10:43, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> It is convenient that this falls out, but likely surprising for nregs.
> Please add a comment to nregs explaining the dual use of nregs to represent
> both the number of Q registers used for the type, and the number of elements
> touched by the structu
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:14:42AM +0100, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> The previous patches leave ld[234]_lane, st[234]_lane, and ld[234]r expanders
> all nearly identical, so we can easily parameterize across the number of
> lanes and combine them.
>
> For the ld_lane pattern, I switched from the VCONQ
The previous patches leave ld[234]_lane, st[234]_lane, and ld[234]r expanders
all nearly identical, so we can easily parameterize across the number of lanes
and combine them.
For the ld_lane pattern, I switched from the VCONQ attribute to
just using the MODE attribute, this is identical for all
The previous patches leave ld[234]_lane, st[234]_lane, and ld[234]r expanders
all nearly identical, so we can easily parameterize across the number of lanes
and combine them.
For the ld_lane pattern, I switched from the VCONQ attribute to
just using the MODE attribute, this is identical for all
