On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:21:55PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 15/12/16 11:56, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:35:09AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>Similar to the previous patch this transforms X-reg UBFIZ instructions into
> >>W-reg LSL instructi
On 15/12/16 11:56, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:35:09AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Similar to the previous patch this transforms X-reg UBFIZ instructions into
W-reg LSL instructions when the UBFIZ operands add up to 32, so we can take
advantage of the implicit z
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:35:09AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Similar to the previous patch this transforms X-reg UBFIZ instructions into
> W-reg LSL instructions when the UBFIZ operands add up to 32, so we can take
> advantage of the implicit zero-extension to DImode
> when writin
Hi all,
Similar to the previous patch this transforms X-reg UBFIZ instructions into
W-reg LSL instructions
when the UBFIZ operands add up to 32, so we can take advantage of the implicit
zero-extension to DImode
when writing to a W-register.
This is done by splitting the existing *andim_ashift_
