On Nov 9, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> The aarch64 port does not define TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT.
> Ok for trunk and GCC 5?
:-) I’d endorse it, but, best left to the target folks.
On 9 November 2015 at 15:45, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 09/11/15 15:34, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>>
>> On 9 November 2015 at 11:32, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2015-11-09 Kyrylo Tkachov
>>>
>>> PR target/68129
>>> * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT): Define to
On 09/11/15 15:34, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 9 November 2015 at 11:32, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
2015-11-09 Kyrylo Tkachov
PR target/68129
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h (TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT): Define to 1.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_print_operand, CONST_DOUBLE):
On 9 November 2015 at 11:32, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> 2015-11-09 Kyrylo Tkachov
>
> PR target/68129
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT): Define to 1.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_print_operand, CONST_DOUBLE):
> Delete VOIDmode case. Assert that mode
Hi all,
In this PR we hit an ICE in simplify-rtx.c:
#if TARGET_SUPPORTS_WIDE_INT == 0
/* This assert keeps the simplification from producing a result
that cannot be represented in a CONST_DOUBLE but a lot of
upstream callers expect that this function never fails to
simplify s