On 11 February 2016 at 19:04, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> On 11/02/16 17:57, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 11 February 2016 at 14:10, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/02/16 10:39, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:32:16AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> H
On 11/02/16 17:57, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 11 February 2016 at 14:10, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
On 10/02/16 10:39, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:32:16AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi James,
On 10/02/16 10:11, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:31PM +
On 11 February 2016 at 14:10, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> On 10/02/16 10:39, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:32:16AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> On 10/02/16 10:11, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:31PM +, Kyrill T
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:10:33PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>>Why not just keep the last string you printed, and use a string compare
> >>>to decide whether to print or not? Sure we'll end up doing a bit more
> >>>work, but the logic becomes simpler to follow and we don't need to pass
> >>>a
On 10/02/16 10:39, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:32:16AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi James,
On 10/02/16 10:11, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:31PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GC
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:32:16AM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 10/02/16 10:11, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:31PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
> >>aarch6
Hi James,
On 10/02/16 10:11, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:31PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
aarch64 port to emit a .arch assembly directive for each function that
describes the archite
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:50:31PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
> aarch64 port to emit a .arch assembly directive for each function that
> describes the architectural features used by that function. This is
On 04/02/16 17:12, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
aarch64 port
to emit a .arch assembly directive for each function that describes the
architectural features
used b
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
> aarch64 port
> to emit a .arch assembly directive for each function that describes the
> architectural features
> used by that function. This is a cha
Hi all,
As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
aarch64 port
to emit a .arch assembly directive for each function that describes the
architectural features
used by that function. This is a change from GCC 5 behaviour where we output a
single .arch directiv
11 matches
Mail list logo
