2014-11-15 15:49 GMT+00:00 Andrew Pinski :
>> My local modifications can be found in the gcc git at
>> apinski/thunderx-cost. Note I reverted this patch so I can continue
>> working. The testcase is compiling newlib. Let me try to get it
>> again.
>> I was configuring a combined build with:
>> -
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Jiong Wang
> wrote:
>> 2014-11-15 0:15 GMT+00:00 Andrew Pinski :
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 27/09/14 22:20, Kugan wrote:
>
>
> On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wr
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Jiong Wang
wrote:
> 2014-11-15 0:15 GMT+00:00 Andrew Pinski :
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>> On 27/09/14 22:20, Kugan wrote:
On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>
>> + /* If we decided that we didn't need a leaf fra
2014-11-15 0:15 GMT+00:00 Andrew Pinski :
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
>> On 27/09/14 22:20, Kugan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wrote:
>
> + /* If we decided that we didn't need a leaf frame pointer but then used
> + LR in the function, then we'll w
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
> On 27/09/14 22:20, Kugan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22/09/14 16:43, Kugan wrote:
>>>
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
>>>
On 30 September 2014 16:00, Jiong Wang wrote:
> gcc/
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.h (CALL_USED_REGISTERS): Mark LR as caller-save.
> (EPILOGUE_USES): Guard the check by epilogue_completed.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_layout_frame): Explictly check for LR.
> (aarch64_can_eliminate)
On 01/10/14 09:00, Kugan wrote:
On 01/10/14 01:00, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 27/09/14 22:20, Kugan wrote:
On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 22/09/14 16:43, Kugan wrote:
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not
used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
https://gcc
On 01/10/14 01:00, Jiong Wang wrote:
> On 27/09/14 22:20, Kugan wrote:
>>
>> On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>> On 22/09/14 16:43, Kugan wrote:
>>>
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not
used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
https://gcc.gn
On 27/09/14 22:20, Kugan wrote:
On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 22/09/14 16:43, Kugan wrote:
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42017. In AArch64, this
test-case nee
On 23/09/14 01:58, Jiong Wang wrote:
> On 22/09/14 16:43, Kugan wrote:
>
>> AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not used in
>> leaf functions. This was reported in
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42017. In AArch64, this
>> test-case need to be added with
On 22/09/14 16:43, Kugan wrote:
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42017. In AArch64, this
test-case need to be added with more live ranges for the need for the
LR_REGNUM. i.e
AArch64 has the same issue ARM had where the LR register was not used in
leaf functions. This was reported in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42017. In AArch64, this
test-case need to be added with more live ranges for the need for the
LR_REGNUM. i.e test-case in the PR needs additiona
12 matches
Mail list logo
