On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:42:38PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When extending the aarch64_handle_option function for GCC 6 I introduced a
> thinko
> when handling the -momit-leaf-frame-pointer option and had it set the variable
> for -fomit-frame-pointer instead. This hasn't been p
Hi all,
When extending the aarch64_handle_option function for GCC 6 I introduced a
thinko
when handling the -momit-leaf-frame-pointer option and had it set the variable
for -fomit-frame-pointer instead. This hasn't been particularly impactful
because
-momit-leaf-frame-pointer is on by default a
