Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Fix PR 56809

2013-04-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:07:50PM +0100, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote: > This patch fixes a PR that was exposed in the recent jump table > reorganisation. > We should use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn in the jump table > handling code. > > This fixes the incorrect assembly generation that we

Re: [PATCH][AArch64] Fix PR 56809

2013-04-03 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote: > > Hi all, > > This patch fixes a PR that was exposed in the recent jump table > reorganisation. > We should use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn in the jump table > handling code. > > This fixes the incorrect assembly generation tha

[PATCH][AArch64] Fix PR 56809

2013-04-03 Thread Kyrylo Tkachov
Hi all, This patch fixes a PR that was exposed in the recent jump table reorganisation. We should use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn in the jump table handling code. This fixes the incorrect assembly generation that we get when building newlib for aarch64. Tested aarch64-none-elf. A