Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 01/11/17 17:40, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> As far as I understand it, because we have 128-bit types, a malloc of
>> anything greater than 16 bytes would require 16-byte alignment. So, assuming
>> this macro isn't required to desribe possibly unaligned smaller allocatio
On 01/11/17 17:40, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:07:54PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>> The AArch64 backend currently doesn't set MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT, so
>> add this to enable alignment optimizations on malloc pointers.
>>
>> OK for commit?
>
> As far as I understand it, b
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 05:07:54PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> The AArch64 backend currently doesn't set MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT, so
> add this to enable alignment optimizations on malloc pointers.
>
> OK for commit?
As far as I understand it, because we have 128-bit types, a malloc of
anything g
The AArch64 backend currently doesn't set MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT, so
add this to enable alignment optimizations on malloc pointers.
OK for commit?
2017-10-31 Wilco Dijkstra
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h (MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT): New define.
--
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.h b/gcc/
