On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:21:46AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review, here's an updated version.
> In the end, I chose to retain the use alloca (other patches in the series
> are reworked to use it too).
>
> How's this?
A nit or two from code you were moving or that got caug
On 20/07/15 17:44, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:20:37PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This one is more meaty than the previous ones. It buffs up the parsing
functions for
the mcpu, march, mtune options, decouples them and makes them return an enum
describing
the
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 04:20:37PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This one is more meaty than the previous ones. It buffs up the parsing
> functions for
> the mcpu, march, mtune options, decouples them and makes them return an enum
> describing
> the errors that may occur. This will
Hi all,
This one is more meaty than the previous ones. It buffs up the parsing
functions for
the mcpu, march, mtune options, decouples them and makes them return an enum
describing
the errors that may occur. This will allow us to use these functions in other
contexts
beyond aarch64_override_o