On 27/01/15 16:13, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes arm/atomic-op-consume.c test to expect safe "LDAEX"
instruction to be generated when __ATOMIC_CONSUME semantics is requested.
This patch was tested by running the modified
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Alex Velenko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This patch fixes arm/atomic-op-consume.c test to expect safe "LDAEX"
> instruction to be generated when __ATOMIC_CONSUME semantics is requested.
>
> This patch was tested by running the modified test on arm-none-eabi and
> arm-none-l
Hi,
This patch fixes arm/atomic-op-consume.c test to expect safe "LDAEX"
instruction to be generated when __ATOMIC_CONSUME semantics is requested.
This patch was tested by running the modified test on arm-none-eabi and
arm-none-linux-gnueabi compilers.
Is this patch ok?
Alex
2015-01-27 Alex