On 22 May 2014 14:03, Jiong Wang wrote:
> gcc/testsuite
> gcc.target/aarch64/tail-indirect-call_1.c: New test.
That should be tail_indirect_call_1.c as requested in the previous
review. Otherwise this is OK to commit.
/Marcus
On 21/05/14 15:44, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Couple of comments:
+typedef void FP(int);
GNU style please, space before (.
+void f1(FP fp, int n) { (fp)(n); }
GNU style please, line breaks after void, '(' and ';'. Space between
')' an '('. Likewise in the following line.
We should really follow
Hi,
On 18 March 2014 14:13, Jiong Wang wrote:
> * config/aarch64/predicates.md (aarch64_call_insn_operand): New
> predicate.
> * config/aarch64/constraints.md ("Ucs", "Usf"): New constraints.
> * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*sibcall_insn, *sibcall_value_insn): Adjust
> for
> tail
^Ping...
ok for stage 1?
Regards,
Jiong
On 02/04/14 12:04, Jiong Wang wrote:
^Ping...
Regards,
Jiong
On 18/03/14 14:13, Jiong Wang wrote:
Current, indirect function call prevents tail-call optimization on
AArch64.
This patch adapt the fix for PR arm/19599 to AArch64.
Is it ok for next st
^Ping...
Regards,
Jiong
On 18/03/14 14:13, Jiong Wang wrote:
Current, indirect function call prevents tail-call optimization on AArch64.
This patch adapt the fix for PR arm/19599 to AArch64.
Is it ok for next stage 1?
Thanks.
-- Jiong
gcc/
* config/aarch64/predicates.md (aarch64_cal
Current, indirect function call prevents tail-call optimization on AArch64.
This patch adapt the fix for PR arm/19599 to AArch64.
Is it ok for next stage 1?
Thanks.
-- Jiong
gcc/
* config/aarch64/predicates.md (aarch64_call_insn_operand): New
predicate.
* config/aarch64/constraints
