Re: [PATCH][4.8 backport] S/390: Transactional Execution support

2013-08-14 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 14/08/13 15:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> I would like to apply backports of the TX support patches to 4.8 >> branch. We released 4.8 with EC12 support already but the support is >> somewhat incomplete without having TX. With the

Re: [PATCH][4.8 backport] S/390: Transactional Execution support

2013-08-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:55:15AM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > I would like to apply backports of the TX support patches to 4.8 > branch. We released 4.8 with EC12 support already but the support is > somewhat incomplete without having TX. With these patches we will > have full EC12 support i

Re: [PATCH][4.8 backport] S/390: Transactional Execution support

2013-08-02 Thread Torvald Riegel
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:55 +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > Torvald, could you please consider adding backports of the following > patches to the 4.8 branch? > > 19/06/13 [patch] libitm: Fix handling of reentrancy in the HTM fastpath > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg01132.html > > 2

[PATCH][4.8 backport] S/390: Transactional Execution support

2013-08-01 Thread Andreas Krebbel
Hi, I would like to apply backports of the TX support patches to 4.8 branch. We released 4.8 with EC12 support already but the support is somewhat incomplete without having TX. With these patches we will have full EC12 support in 4.8. The patches apply without changes but I had to add some conf