On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:39:33PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > 2014-10-15 Richard Biener
>
> Shouldn't Prathamesh be listed as co-author of the patch?
Yes, of course.
> > + fprintf (f, "case SSA_NAME:\n");
> > + fprintf (f, "{\n");
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:39:33PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> 2014-10-15 Richard Biener
Shouldn't Prathamesh be listed as co-author of the patch?
> + fprintf (f, "case SSA_NAME:\n");
> + fprintf (f, "{\n");
> + fprintf (f, "gimple def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (%s);\n",
>
This is the first patch in a series of N to merge from the
match-and-simplify branch.
The goal of the work is to get rid of the dependence on GENERIC
folding in all our GIMPLE optimizers. This means that GIMPLE
no longer needs to build GENERIC to get it optimized and then
re-gimplify it via for
