On May 16, 2014 7:07:11 PM CEST, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 05/16/14 02:02, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>> Quiet as usual.
>Which strongly suggests folks trust you to do the right thing here :-)
> I think the FRE/PRE reference in $SUBJECT made me ignore the patch
>entirely -- my brain hurts when I look
On 05/16/14 02:02, Richard Biener wrote:
Quiet as usual.
Which strongly suggests folks trust you to do the right thing here :-)
I think the FRE/PRE reference in $SUBJECT made me ignore the patch
entirely -- my brain hurts when I look at our tree PRE implementation.
Jeff
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Ok, not really predicate aware, but this makes value-numbering
> pessimistically handle non-executable edges. In the following
> patch groundwork is laid and PHI value-numbering is adjusted
> to take advantage of edges known to be not executable.
>
Ok, not really predicate aware, but this makes value-numbering
pessimistically handle non-executable edges. In the following
patch groundwork is laid and PHI value-numbering is adjusted
to take advantage of edges known to be not executable.
SCCVN is not well-suited to be control aware, but we st