On Fri, 4 Dec 2015, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> On 04/12/15 17:46, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/12/15 16:04, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On December 4, 2015 4:32:33 PM GMT+01:00, Alan Lawrence
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 27/11/15 08:30, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This is
On 04/12/15 17:46, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 04/12/15 16:04, Richard Biener wrote:
On December 4, 2015 4:32:33 PM GMT+01:00, Alan Lawrence
wrote:
On 27/11/15 08:30, Richard Biener wrote:
This is part 1 of a fix for PR68533 which shows that some targets
cannot can_vec_perm_p on an ide
On 04/12/15 16:04, Richard Biener wrote:
> On December 4, 2015 4:32:33 PM GMT+01:00, Alan Lawrence
> wrote:
>> On 27/11/15 08:30, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> This is part 1 of a fix for PR68533 which shows that some targets
>>> cannot can_vec_perm_p on an identity permutation. I chose to fix
On December 4, 2015 4:32:33 PM GMT+01:00, Alan Lawrence
wrote:
>On 27/11/15 08:30, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> This is part 1 of a fix for PR68533 which shows that some targets
>> cannot can_vec_perm_p on an identity permutation. I chose to fix
>> this in the vectorizer by detecting the identity
On 27/11/15 08:30, Richard Biener wrote:
This is part 1 of a fix for PR68533 which shows that some targets
cannot can_vec_perm_p on an identity permutation. I chose to fix
this in the vectorizer by detecting the identity itself but with
the current structure of vect_transform_slp_perm_load this
This is part 1 of a fix for PR68533 which shows that some targets
cannot can_vec_perm_p on an identity permutation. I chose to fix
this in the vectorizer by detecting the identity itself but with
the current structure of vect_transform_slp_perm_load this is
somewhat awkward. Thus the following n
