On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 05:04:37PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > Why did you use check_runtime_nocache btw? Is that just copy-paste?
>
> Just copy-paste.
>
> Like the target_clones stuff, right now, it is only x86 and PowerPC that
> supports __builtin_cpu*.
>
> I don't really see the point
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:48:50PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> As Peter said, I'd rather test for "ppc32", so this works anywhere.
Fair enough.
> That would give
>
> proc check_cpu_supports_available { } {
> if { [istarget powerpc*-*-*] } {
> return [check_runtime cpu_supports
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 07:53:21PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> --- gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp (revision 249606)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp (working copy)
> @@ -1930,6 +1930,37 @@ proc check_effective_target_powerpc64_no
> } {-O2}]
> }
>
> +# Re
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:58:40AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 6/27/17 6:53 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > This adds a target supports option in dejagnu so that future tests can use
> > this
> > to determine whether or not to test target_clones.
>
> I like the idea, but some comments...
>
On 6/27/17 6:53 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> This adds a target supports option in dejagnu so that future tests can use
> this
> to determine whether or not to test target_clones.
I like the idea, but some comments...
> + #ifdef __MACH__
> + asm volatile ("xxlor vs0,
On 06/27/2017 05:53 PM, Michael Meissner wrote:
> The PowerPC __builtin_cpu_supports and __builtin_cpu_is built-in functions
> require GLIBC 2.23, since they use fixed words at the end of thread control
> area to store the HWCAP and HWCAP2 bits. If the compiler was not configured
> with the approp
The PowerPC __builtin_cpu_supports and __builtin_cpu_is built-in functions
require GLIBC 2.23, since they use fixed words at the end of thread control
area to store the HWCAP and HWCAP2 bits. If the compiler was not configured
with the appropriate GLIBC, the compiler will generate a 0 as the resul
