On 12/13/18 12:10 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> As we discussed, the manual isn't completely consistent in its
> use of @code for const and volatile qualifiers. I made a pass
> through extend.texi and added @code wherever it seemed to be
> missing. This doesn't mean all uses but only those that
> spe
As we discussed, the manual isn't completely consistent in its
use of @code for const and volatile qualifiers. I made a pass
through extend.texi and added @code wherever it seemed to be
missing. This doesn't mean all uses but only those that
specifically refer to the qualifiers. In terms like "
