On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 16:45 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > + /* If we have a boolean variable allow it and generate a compare
> > + to zero reg when expanding. */
> > + if (!g)
> > +return (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (t)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE);
> Depending on how you use T, you might be better off che
On 05/01/2017 11:16 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> This is a resubmittal of an earlier patch
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg00203.html) to improve the
> use of ccmp (conditional compare) on aarch64. I made a couple of tweaks
> after the first submittal and retested now that we are bac
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 14:58 +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:06:51AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> >
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00021.html
> >
> > Ping.
> Hi Steve,
>
> These changes all look like they are to the tree pass rather than to the
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:06:51AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00021.html
>
> Ping.
Hi Steve,
These changes all look like they are to the tree pass rather than to the
AArch64 back end. Maybe reposting it without the AArch64 tag will get it
more v
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00021.html
Ping.
Steve Ellcey
sell...@cavium.com
This is a resubmittal of an earlier patch
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg00203.html) to improve the
use of ccmp (conditional compare) on aarch64. I made a couple of tweaks
after the first submittal and retested now that we are back in stage 1.
Most of the changes are restructuring
