> > From: Matthew Fortune
> >
> > I think the skip is OK here. I'd like to get Catherine's opinion on
> > this though too. I don't think we should change the definition of __PIC__
> > for -fPIC on MIPS as multi-got solves 'most' issues. If we start trying to
> > figure out what __PIC__ should mean
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 11:37 AM
> To: Moore, Catherine
> Cc: Toma Tabacu ; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH,testsuite] Skip gcc.dg/pic-2.c and gcc.dg/pie-2.c
Toma Tabacu writes:
> The gcc.dg/pic-2.c and gcc.dg/pie-2.c tests are failing for MIPS targets
> because __PIC__ is always set to 1 for MIPS.
>
> This patch makes the testsuite skip those two tests for all MIPS
> targets.
>
> Tested with mips-mti-elf and mips-mti-linux-gnu.
>
> Should I have fi
Hi,
The gcc.dg/pic-2.c and gcc.dg/pie-2.c tests are failing for MIPS targets
because __PIC__ is always set to 1 for MIPS.
This patch makes the testsuite skip those two tests for all MIPS targets.
Tested with mips-mti-elf and mips-mti-linux-gnu.
Should I have fixed this in target-supports.exp in
