On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 11:45:13AM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> Additional comments below.
> I've made note of the comments, and request (ask) that this be
> approved, with a pinky promise that I intend to follow up on the
> suggestions in my next patch series.
Suggestions aren't requirements :-
7;s ...
Additional comments below.
I've made note of the comments, and request (ask) that this be
approved, with a pinky promise that I intend to follow up on the
suggestions in my next patch series.
>
> on 2022/6/7 06:05, will schmidt wrote:
> > [PATCH,RS6000 2/5) Rework the
Hi Will,
The whole series looks good to me, thanks! IMHO one place can be
further refactored, not sure if it's worth to updating together in
this series, it's ...
on 2022/6/7 06:05, will schmidt wrote:
> [PATCH,RS6000 2/5) Rework the RS6000_BTM defines.
>
> The RS6000_B
[PATCH,RS6000 2/5) Rework the RS6000_BTM defines.
The RS6000_BTM_ definitions are mostly unused after the rs6000
builtin code was reworked. The remaining references can be replaced
with the OPTION_MASK_ and MASK_ equivalents.
This patch remvoes the defines:
RS6000_BTM_FRES, RS6000_BTM_FRSQRTE
