Re: [PATCH,PR50763] Follow-up patch to fix i686 bootstrap failure

2011-11-04 Thread Tom de Vries
On 11/02/2011 07:02 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 10/26/2011 10:38 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> Richard, >>> >>> I have a patch for the i686 bootstrap problem reported in PR50763 comment >>> 10. >>> >>> pr50763-2.c looks like this before t

Re: [PATCH,PR50763] Follow-up patch to fix i686 bootstrap failure

2011-11-02 Thread Tom de Vries
On 10/26/2011 10:38 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: >> Richard, >> >> I have a patch for the i686 bootstrap problem reported in PR50763 comment 10. >> >> pr50763-2.c looks like this before tail_merge_optimize: >> ... >> std_canonical_va_list_type

Re: [PATCH,PR50763] Follow-up patch to fix i686 bootstrap failure

2011-10-26 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > Richard, > > I have a patch for the i686 bootstrap problem reported in PR50763 comment 10. > > pr50763-2.c looks like this before tail_merge_optimize: > ... > std_canonical_va_list_type (union tree_node * typeD.1608) > { >  _BoolD.1576 pretmp.

Re: [PATCH,PR50763] Follow-up patch to fix i686 bootstrap failure

2011-10-25 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > Richard, > > I have a patch for the i686 bootstrap problem reported in PR50763 comment 10. > > pr50763-2.c looks like this before tail_merge_optimize: > ... > std_canonical_va_list_type (union tree_node * typeD.1608) > { >  _BoolD.1576 pretmp.

[PATCH,PR50763] Follow-up patch to fix i686 bootstrap failure

2011-10-25 Thread Tom de Vries
Richard, I have a patch for the i686 bootstrap problem reported in PR50763 comment 10. pr50763-2.c looks like this before tail_merge_optimize: ... std_canonical_va_list_type (union tree_node * typeD.1608) { _BoolD.1576 pretmp.6D.2739; union tree_node * pretmp.5D.2738; _BoolD.1576 pretmp.4D.